1 |
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:57:03 +0200 |
2 |
Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> This may apply to easy and/or 99%-technical problems with a dictator |
4 |
> around. That's not what we have here. It's two black-and-white for |
5 |
> my taste, too. |
6 |
|
7 |
No, that's the nice thing about delivering a product based upon |
8 |
technical merit: most of the time, there are right answers and there |
9 |
are wrong answers, and careful investigation and good management can |
10 |
lead to it being determined which is which. |
11 |
|
12 |
> > All bringing more sensitive people in does is cripples the |
13 |
> > distribution's ability to delivery any technical improvements, |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Looking at it the other way around: with more sensitive people around, |
16 |
> collaboration would work better potentially leading to less loss of |
17 |
> time and energy and therefore quicker arrival of improvements. |
18 |
|
19 |
Collaboration works when good ideas get kept and bad ideas get dropped. |
20 |
Collaboration fails when good ideas are rejected because people don't |
21 |
like who came up with them or the tone in which they were presented, or |
22 |
when bad ideas are kept around to avoid hurting the feelings of the |
23 |
people who came up with those ideas. |
24 |
|
25 |
> > Personally, I'd like to see Gentoo start having the kinds of people |
26 |
> > who deliver a better product, not the kinds of people who worry |
27 |
> > that using a gender-ambiguous cow as a logo might be offensive. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I don't consider that comment respectful. |
30 |
|
31 |
But do you consider it to be correct? |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Ciaran McCreesh |