1 |
On 04/28/2011 04:07 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote: |
2 |
> So once again: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/docs/en/html/lifecycle.html |
5 |
> |
6 |
> *Every* new bug filed by a user without editbugs will have "UNCONFIRMED" |
7 |
> (old NEW) as fixed status. |
8 |
> *If* we don't enable the UNCONFIRMED status at all then it will |
9 |
> CONFIRMED as default but we would enable the UNCONFIRMED status. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Bug wranglers can then assign the bug and they also *can* mark it as |
12 |
> CONFIRMED *if* they *can* confirm it. |
13 |
> The maintainer may change the status to IN_PROGRESS (old ASSIGNED) |
14 |
> afterwards. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> The snipped of my first mail may be a bit confusing... It just means: |
17 |
> NEW will become CONFIRMED, NEW has been fully replaced by CONFIRMED so |
18 |
> NEW is gone but CONFIRMED is *not* the new default status. CONFIRMED |
19 |
> would/could be the default for everybody with editbugs. |
20 |
> ASSIGNED gone, replacement: IN_PROGRESS, |
21 |
> REOPENED gone, |
22 |
> CLOSED gone. VERIFIED will be added. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> So I think we should convert... |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
I think I'll convert the workflow in about 24h if nobody really |
28 |
complains. There is more positive feedback anyway. |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Regards, |
32 |
Christian Ruppert |
33 |
Role: Gentoo Linux developer, Bugzilla administrator and Infrastructure |
34 |
member |
35 |
Fingerprint: EEB1 C341 7C84 B274 6C59 F243 5EAB 0C62 B427 ABC8 |