1 |
2011/6/26 Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com>: |
2 |
> 2011/6/26 Jesús J. Guerrero Botella <jesus.guerrero.botella@×××××.com>: |
3 |
>> I am really amazed that someone didn't want to use links (a solution |
4 |
>> with next to zero work involved) because they are not available in |
5 |
>> fat32 (as if fat32 was relevant at all for us) but then people is |
6 |
>> suggesting that we should put everything into a flat folder and use |
7 |
>> tags. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Well, the difference being "Symlinks are only really surplus utilities |
10 |
> that make it easier for users" and "Some degree of backcompat" instead |
11 |
> of "Core Functionality that will be required to make the code work". |
12 |
> |
13 |
> In theory, if you have the "most recent" versions of your package |
14 |
> manager, after this change takes place, you will not need any symlinks |
15 |
> at all, and functionality should still be retained if they were blown |
16 |
> out completely. |
17 |
|
18 |
The real question is why something that has been into POSIX since ever |
19 |
can't be used for something that has also always been fs-based since |
20 |
it was born (that's "portage"). |
21 |
|
22 |
I an not saying that this other system doesn't have it's advantages. I |
23 |
am just saying that if I wanted a db-like-but-not-db-based system I'd |
24 |
probably reinvent any .deb or .rpm based distro, rather than retouch |
25 |
something based (even marginally) on BSD ports. |
26 |
|
27 |
That still doesn't answer my question anyway: both features (symlinks |
28 |
and +65k files on a single dir) are incompatible with fat32. And |
29 |
someone said fat32 compatibility is a feature we want (still can't |
30 |
guess why, but well, be consequent...). Obviously, we want fat32 |
31 |
compatibility when it comes to arguing against symlinks, which have |
32 |
always been with us by the way, but that's not important when we talk |
33 |
about other things that are not compatible with fat32. |
34 |
|
35 |
Links seem to look not so elegant today, but we use them everyday for |
36 |
eselect, /etc and even in the handbook. but Oh!, They are not that |
37 |
good for portage. |
38 |
-- |
39 |
Jesús Guerrero Botella |