1 |
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:58:20 +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: |
2 |
> On 12/1/10 9:34 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: |
3 |
>> Catalyst sends automated emails to releng@g.o from the |
4 |
>> various build boxes: dolphin, poseidon, other dev.g.o machines. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> So we have some automatic reporting. Can we have a webpage for that, |
7 |
> or |
8 |
> a mailing list that people can subscribe to? |
9 |
|
10 |
Before anyone creates a duplicate bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/329165 ;) |
11 |
-Jeremy |
12 |
|
13 |
> Idea: make python team receive those emails. ;-) |
14 |
> |
15 |
>>> I am curious how often stage builds fail (how long can they be |
16 |
>>> broken until we actually care?) |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Fairly often, especially in the last couple of months or so. There |
19 |
>> were some arches that, last I checked, hadn't had |
20 |
>> any new media in several months. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Do we have some bugs or other actions towards fixing those problems? |
23 |
> |
24 |
>> I see messages like this pretty much every day. Releng is |
25 |
>> understaffed on a few arches, which is why no one has time to track |
26 |
>> down the errors, fix them, and get the builds completed. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Is it possible to bisect the portage tree and identify a breaking |
29 |
> commit? |
30 |
> |
31 |
> By the way, it would be great to have some kind of continuous |
32 |
> integration for the portage tree, even something very basic, and |
33 |
> visible |
34 |
> to the public. |