| 1 |
On 15:20 Thu 01 Sep , Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dne 1.9.2011 15:15, Michał Górny napsal(a): |
| 3 |
> > We can either go with a new func and retroactively replace the |
| 4 |
> > eclass, or retroactively fix all uses and fix the old funcs. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> As even if you fix main tree you can't ensure that you won't mess with |
| 7 |
> some overlay (silently as it would not be seen by default). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I would then go proactively and fix the packages inheriting the bashcomp |
| 10 |
> eclass and when done just mark the eclass as dead. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Yes, please stop breaking backwards compat without version bumps to a |
| 13 |
new eclass. It's just as annoying in an eclass as in a shared library. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Thanks, |
| 17 |
Donnie |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Donnie Berkholz |
| 20 |
Council Member / Sr. Developer |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 22 |
Blog: http://dberkholz.com |
Archives