On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:57:23 -0500
Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@g.o> wrote:
> This is not about arches just being slackers.  This is about arches
> denying stable (or even ~) for some reason.  If I cannot drop an old
> version of something just because the new version doesn't (and won't)
> work on an arch, that's really bad for me.

What is the cost of keeping it there and not changing it?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh