Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: Re: [RFC]flag-o-matic.eclass strip-flags change to support prefix
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:48:28 +0200
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:03:22 +0400
Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@g.o> wrote:

> 2012/6/17 Justin <jlec@g.o>:
> > On 17.06.2012 15:23, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
> >> 2012/6/17 Justin <jlec@g.o>:
> >>> On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L
> >>>> and -I flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for
> >>>> prefix bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix for strip-flags
> >>>> function to
> >>>
> >>> Is this really necessary? I never experienced any problems which
> >>> need this when following the guides. I looks like a hack, because
> >>> something else is borked.
> >>
> >> I've just hit binutils on OpenBSD not finding libdl.so installed in
> >> $EPREFIX/usr/lib/ because of this.
> >> Don't tell me that OpenBSD prefix is unsupported, i'm working on
> >> getting it supported.
> >>
> >
> > I am still not convinced. libdl.so is provided by glibc, at least
> > on my linux system. And glibc is one of the rare packages which
> > needs to be provided by the host system instead of being installed
> > in the prefix.
> >
> > Is there something different on BSD which makes libdl.so appear
> > inside the prefix?
> 
> At least on OpenBSD dlopen() is not in libdl.so, but in ld.so itself,
> so I have to install dummy libdl.so to ${EPREFIX}/usr/lib.
> I think we should use Fabian's solution from the bug, if it does not
> cause any unwanted consequences.

Shouldn't configure detect that no libdl is necessary?


-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: [RFC]flag-o-matic.eclass strip-flags change to support prefix
-- Maxim Koltsov
References:
Re: [RFC]flag-o-matic.eclass strip-flags change to support prefix
-- Justin
Re: [RFC]flag-o-matic.eclass strip-flags change to support prefix
-- Maxim Koltsov
Re: [RFC]flag-o-matic.eclass strip-flags change to support prefix
-- Justin
Re: [RFC]flag-o-matic.eclass strip-flags change to support prefix
-- Maxim Koltsov
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [RFC]flag-o-matic.eclass strip-flags change to support prefix
Next by thread:
Re: [RFC]flag-o-matic.eclass strip-flags change to support prefix
Previous by date:
Re: [RFC] Dynamic SLOTs
Next by date:
Re: Re: UEFI secure boot and Gentoo


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.