Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
Subject: Re: Suggestion for getting rid of udev
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:00:23 +0530
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@...> wrote:
>> Goodbye desktop users then.
>>
>> We recently dropped HAL. Now all the magic that was done by HAL (and
>> required udev anyway) is done through udev directly.
>
>  My system worked just fine before HAL was introduced, thank you.  I
> always had sys-apps/hal and sys-apps/dbus in /etc/portage/package.mask
> and my system continued to work just fine, thank you.  Given the great
> HAL fiasco, the fact that HAL has been incorporated into udev is yet one
> more reason for dropping udev <G>.
>

Then please continue with udev in package.mask and kindly stop trying
to impose your workflow on the rest of the world.

This thread is a waste of time.

-- 
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team


Replies:
Re: Suggestion for getting rid of udev
-- Ciaran McCreesh
References:
Suggestion for getting rid of udev
-- Walter Dnes
Re: Suggestion for getting rid of udev
-- Michał Górny
Re: Suggestion for getting rid of udev
-- Walter Dnes
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Suggestion for getting rid of udev
Next by thread:
Re: Suggestion for getting rid of udev
Previous by date:
Re: Suggestion for getting rid of udev
Next by date:
Re: Suggestion for getting rid of udev


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.