List Archive: gentoo-dev
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Mike Frysinger <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Monday 25 June 2012 00:15:59 Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
>> like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the tree.
>> I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like some
>> advice on how to make this as smooth as possible.
>> My main concern is that many people probably have sys-boot/grub in
>> @world. If grub:2 is made visible, portage will install it, and will
>> remove grub-0.97 on the next depclean. This could be a little confusing,
>> but should not cause any immediate damage since the copy of grub-0.97
>> installed in the MBR and /boot would remain intact.
>> Is this worthy of a news item? Or I just blog about it?
>> Anything else I need to think about here?
> do we have automatic migration/updating in place like with grub1 ? that was
> the biggest reason i didn't unleash it for automatic installing on people's
No, the grub2 ebuild does not automatically install the files in /boot.
grub2-install performs this step, and must be run by the user. It also
installs the MBR and embeds the core image in unused disk sectors.
This way the MBR/core image is always kept in sync with the files in
I don't really see a way to reliably call grub2-install from the
ebuild, and I think this would be a bit unfriendly to the user anyway.