1 |
On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote: |
2 |
> On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse<george.prowse@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> [...] |
4 |
>> If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong. |
5 |
>> Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help |
6 |
>> Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like |
7 |
>> litigation when trying to protect it's logo. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I think the argument is that the wiki is not always accurate, and if |
10 |
> perceived as the official documentation, can put is in bad light. |
11 |
> |
12 |
There is *always* a chance of that, official or otherwise |