Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I noticed this a while ago. See bug 18951.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18951
On Friday 09 May 2003 08:01 pm, Robin H.Johnson wrote:
> [copied to -core because of license stuff, please reply on -dev]
>
> I'm putting together an ebuild for libcap (bug #2333), and I ran into
> something in the tree.
>
> The license included with it wasn't one I had seen myself before so I
> was checking if it was in $PORTAGE/licenses. I see that all of libcap,
> PAM and PWDB have identical licenses (except for the same of the
> package).
>
> The license in question seems to a dual BSD/GPL license.
>
> Instead of creating a new libcap license file, I think we should
> abstract the package name in PAM/PWDB and point all 3 items to this.
> Possible name is $PORTAGE/licenses/BSD_GPL
>
> Comments/For/Against/Flames?
- --
Luke-Jr
Newbie Application Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+vFW/Zl/BHdU+lYMRArR/AJ4puuS0DUl0X/s1pYp1eQlCIfJgtwCcCWsb
deqFAwsKvniun4yskdkKz7s=
=nlwF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
|
|