1 |
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 06:37:43PM +1000, Rendhalver [Peter Brown] wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> a while ago i thought about trying to generate an xml representation |
4 |
> of the portage "database" |
5 |
> |
6 |
> i thought it would be cool to have it as xml cause then we could use |
7 |
> it for various purposes it would include the entire portage tree and |
8 |
> the database with extra bits to say wether a package was installed and |
9 |
> when it was installed its only an idea right now but i dont think it |
10 |
> would be too tricky to do |
11 |
> |
12 |
> i would write it in perl but thats what i am good at |
13 |
> and perl has some nifty XML modules |
14 |
> |
15 |
> anyone else interested in this ?? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> -- |
18 |
> XEmacs Advocate | Do not try the patience of Wizards, |
19 |
> Gentoo Developer | for they are subtle and quick to anger. |
20 |
> Perl Hacker | - Elric (Technomage) , Babylon 5. |
21 |
> Apache God | <mailto:rendhalver at gentoo.org> <GnuPG KeyID: AE51D190> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> -- |
25 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
Would this give any speed up ? I don't know XML database features with |
30 |
perl. Of course you can store some constraint information with packages |
31 |
in XML but what I was thinking about went more in the direction of fast |
32 |
search trees and package hash tables, that the system administrator can |
33 |
search for portage packages and keywords. |
34 |
|
35 |
BYE INGO |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |