| 1 |
El mié, 08-09-2010 a las 01:44 +0400, dev-random@××××.ru escribió: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:30:34PM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 3 |
> > This implies that the upstream is alive enough to fix it. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > I feel it should mean that the bug has been reported to upstream, and |
| 6 |
> > that state is documented in the bug. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > If we keep every upstream bug open instead of closed, we'd have probably |
| 9 |
> > another 2500 open bugs (5312 RESO/UPSTREAM in the history of Gentoo, and |
| 10 |
> > I'm ballparking that 50% aren't actually fixed yet upstream). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Bug may be a blocker. And marking it as RESOLVED/UPSTREAM you may |
| 13 |
> unblock another bug (e.g. stabilization request) which should be still |
| 14 |
> blocked because there is no fixed package in tree. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
In most cases when it's really a blocker, bug will remain opened anyway |
| 18 |
until solved or, if not possible, stabilization will be postponed. |
Archives