1 |
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:36:37 -0500, Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
> On 01/11/2010 06:30 PM, Arnaud Launay wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> As a newsmaster, I'm a bit concerned by this. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Yeah, inn seems like a really high-profile package to mask for removal. |
8 |
> It would be conspicuous in its absence. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Would it make sense to post on -dev BEFORE masking packages like this? |
11 |
> I'm sure there are lots of people who would chip in before something |
12 |
> like this dies. |
13 |
|
14 |
(A general reply, not targeted towards you, Rich) |
15 |
|
16 |
Speaking on behalf of the treecleaners: |
17 |
The fact is, some of us have never heard of "inn" and until Gentoo has |
18 |
some sort of "popularity tracking" software/tool, the treecleaners will |
19 |
continue to mask unmaintained software. We can't possible know about every |
20 |
package in the tree and if it looks like it is unmaintained (open bugs w/o |
21 |
action) then we will mask it for removal unless someone fixes it and |
22 |
maintains it. |
23 |
|
24 |
Let's all move on here and be happy that someone is now maintaining such a |
25 |
popular package. Thanks jer/rej - I'll add you to metadata so it doesn't |
26 |
become unmaintained again :) Wasn't there a GSoC project on popularity of |
27 |
packages? Let's get it implemented already! ;) |
28 |
|
29 |
-Jeremy |
30 |
|
31 |
> |
32 |
> Right now lots of users are going to get errors due to a masked package |
33 |
> until somebody takes the initiative to fix it. I suspect that nobody |
34 |
> wants to poke their head up and risk getting it shot off by doing |
35 |
> something like that... |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Perhaps Gentoo needs a little more of Wikipedia's "Be Bold" attitude and |
38 |
|
39 |
> a little less of their "delete first and ask questions later" attitude. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Note - I'm not suggesting the problem shouldn't be fixed - I'm just |
42 |
> suggesting that in this case the solution is worse than the original |
43 |
> problem. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Rich |