| 1 |
On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 16:57, Peter Ruskin wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 22 Apr 2003 15:26, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The second will facilitate quick acceptance of user-submitted ebuilds |
| 4 |
> > in some way - probably drawing upon the submitters in one way or |
| 5 |
> > another. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I'm more than willing to maintain ebuilds I submit. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Same here. What are the requirements for being a maintainer? |
| 11 |
I don't think one has to make the newest version available ASAP. |
| 12 |
This f.ex. didn't happen with drip - which was why I created a new |
| 13 |
version myself. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I think people who submit ebuilds should automacally be added as |
| 16 |
maintainer of the ebuild. If they contribute with a newer version of a |
| 17 |
given ebuild - then they should be added as maintainer - keeping the old |
| 18 |
maintainer too. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It's a Community distro and I don't think anyone will mind - as long as |
| 21 |
it's all build on volutarity - ie. make a newer version if you like - |
| 22 |
don't if you don't. |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
Klavs Klavsen, GSEC - kl@××××.dk - http://www.vsen.dk |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Working with Unix is like wrestling a worthy opponent. |
| 28 |
Working with windows is like attacking a small whining child |
| 29 |
who is carrying a .38. |
Archives