| 1 |
Josh Saddler wrote: |
| 2 |
> Lars Wendler wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of |
| 4 |
>> the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the |
| 5 |
>> decision to unify/convert the "cdaudio" USE flag into "cdda". |
| 6 |
>> If there's no good reason against this conversion I will proceed with filing |
| 7 |
>> bugs against packages using the "cdaudio" USE flag next weekend. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) |
| 10 |
>> Gentoo Staffer and bug-wrangler |
| 11 |
>> Am Wednesday 08 July 2009 02:52:07 schrieb Duncan: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I object. As discussed earlier in the list, I think "cdaudio" is much |
| 14 |
> more appropriate than "cdda". |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
As also discussed before, cdaudio is too vague and could mean various |
| 17 |
things, while cdda is a very specific thing. This technically correct |
| 18 |
term is less ambiguous, which is what we want here. Also, all the sound |
| 19 |
herd people I spoke are in favour of cdda. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Ben |
| 22 |
sound herd dev |
Archives