Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Christian Hoenig <list@...>
Subject: RFC: equery list <pkg> output
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:55:01 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I am used to etcat -v <pkg> to get the available packages. And as etcat is 
deprecated, I had a look at equery list <pkg>. 

And I really wonder, if people prefer an output like this (from current 
equery):

$ equery list -i -o -p gentoolkit
[ Searching for package 'gentoolkit' in all categories among: ]
 * installed packages
[I--] [  ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre10 (0)
 * Portage tree (/var/portage/tree)
[-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre2 (0)
[-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre4 (0)
[-P-] [  ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre1 (0)
[-P-] [  ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre3 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre9 (0)
[-P-] [  ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre8 (0)
 * overlay tree (/var/portage/overlay)

or in contrast to something like this (which is based on the etcat output):

$ ~/portage/equery.my.old list -i -o -p gentoolkit
Searching for package 'gentoolkit' in all categories among:
 * installed packages
 * Portage tree (/var/portage/tree)
 * overlay tree (/var/portage/overlay)

*  app-portage/gentoolkit-dev
      [-P-] [  ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre1 (0)
      [-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre2 (0)
      [-P-] [  ] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre3 (0)
      [-P-] [M~] app-portage/gentoolkit-dev-0.2.0_pre4 (0)

*  app-portage/gentoolkit
      [-P-] [  ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre8 (0)
      [-P-] [ ~] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre9 (0)
      [I--] [  ] app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.0_pre10 (0)

I have a patch available for current equery to (additionally) generate the 
second output, though I don't know, why one would ever use the first output 
over the second output. 
I wonder, what people would miss, if current output would totally be exchanged 
with my proposed output (based on etcat stuff).


come on and tell me :-)

take care, have fun
/christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBdsKZmauZIX3ydQURAhjYAKD8KRk09A9z06qxdgcdZgsyiRIQqACfQpPo
JF78g1HN19y7Pm246WwbQ6E=
=jQ2i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies:
Re: RFC: equery list <pkg> output
-- Donnie Berkholz
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
[Fwd: [gentoo-user] Calling all Gentoo people in Cambridge, UK]
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: equery list <pkg> output
Previous by date:
[Fwd: [gentoo-user] Calling all Gentoo people in Cambridge, UK]
Next by date:
hidden dependences on termcap.


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.