Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: justin <jlec@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:18:37
Message-Id: 4B4E388F.4030803@j-schmitz.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm by Ben de Groot
1 On 13/01/10 22:02, Ben de Groot wrote:
2 > 2010/1/13 Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>:
3 >> On Tuesday 12 January 2010 15:35:45 Ben de Groot wrote:
4 >>> 2010/1/12 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>:
5 >>>> If you feel like it, become a proxy-maintainer and poke a developer to
6 >>>> put your ebuilds on tree. Have you ever heard of that ? :)
7 >>>
8 >>> Proxy-maintainership should be given a MUCH higher profile in Gentoo,
9 >>> in my opinion. It is a virtually unknown option.
10 >>
11 >> i think our current work flows also significantly impede the smooth running of
12 >> this. if we had were using a dscm (git) on gentoo-x86, i feel like it'd be a
13 >> much smoother ride for Gentoo devs to pull from a proxy maintainer and push on
14 >> their behalf.
15 >> -mike
16 >
17 > I couldn't agree more!
18 >
19
20 So what is the current mood to switch to git. As there is no traffic on
21 the scm-ml I assume that there is no progress. But shouldn' we start to
22 move on? Now!?

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>