1 |
On 05/03/11 19:52, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 11:13 Sun 27 Feb , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: |
5 |
>>>> a quick mail to announce that the gnome team, in order to prepare for |
6 |
>>>> gnome 3, started slotting a lot of gnome team managed packages. If you |
7 |
>>>> find yourself using such a package, please update your ebuilds to use |
8 |
>>>> slot notations or other EAPI compliant notation resulting in the same |
9 |
>>>> effect. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> This email would be much more useful if it included a list of affected |
12 |
>>> packages, sorted by maintainer and/or herd. |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> As requested, here is a (probably) complete list of packages which |
16 |
>> depend on x11-libs/gtk+ without a slot. The list was generated using |
17 |
>> the tinderbox rindex, so it may be slightly out of date. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I've started maintaining an irregularly updated list for gtk+ (and a |
21 |
> few other libraries): |
22 |
> |
23 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~nirbheek/gnome/3.0/slotting/ |
24 |
> |
25 |
> The script I use to generate these lists is: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/gnome.git;a=blob;f=scripts/slot_rindex.py;hb=HEAD |
28 |
> |
29 |
> If you look at the lists in that directory, you'll be able to guess |
30 |
> that there are other libraries which need the same treatment. The list |
31 |
> of these libraries is, however, incomplete right now. We'll be sending |
32 |
> a mail about that later, but folks can fix deps to use slots right now |
33 |
> if they wish. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Thanks to everyone who has fixed deps of their (and other folks') packages! |
36 |
> |
37 |
|
38 |
all sci is fixed. |
39 |
|
40 |
Why do you have a rdeps list for vte. it is in slot 0. Will there be a |
41 |
different slot in future? |
42 |
|
43 |
justin |