| 1 |
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 00:13:41 +0200 |
| 2 |
Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>: |
| 5 |
> > I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it |
| 6 |
> > just means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a |
| 7 |
> > different resolution should be used. So what do you think about |
| 8 |
> > disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21 |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract |
| 13 |
> > says: "We will not hide problems" |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Kill REMIND and LATER, introduce Later keyword or ASSIGNED LATER. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
"Me too."© |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
What happens to bugs already in that state though? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
fonts, by design, by neglect |
| 24 |
gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect |
| 25 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives