| 1 |
Hello all, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I have the following packages that need a home in the portage tree: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
gpe-go |
| 6 |
gpe-julia |
| 7 |
gpe-life |
| 8 |
gpe-lights |
| 9 |
gpe-othello |
| 10 |
gpe-tetris |
| 11 |
gsoko |
| 12 |
xdemineur |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
They are only a few and they won't increase much in the future. |
| 15 |
For this reason I'm reticent in creating the gpe-games category in the |
| 16 |
portage tree as we currently have in the overlay. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
However, I find useful for users to have this category created since it |
| 19 |
would allow them quickly spotting another place for games (these games |
| 20 |
are targeted to -embedded but work on desktop too) while still providing |
| 21 |
the information that they belong to GPE. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Moving each game to the games-xxxx category would be another solution |
| 24 |
but that would pretty much hide the relation with the GPE Palm Environment. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
There is of course another solution, like moving everything into |
| 27 |
gpe-base or gpe-utils and STFU. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
So fellow devs, I'm evoking your experience powers to help me with this |
| 30 |
oh-not-so-important decision. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
PS: Please but please, just don't tell me that adding another category |
| 33 |
will make a longer "ls -l" output in /usr/portage. |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX |
| 36 |
Gentoo Embedded/OMAP850 Developer |
| 37 |
Linwizard Developer |
| 38 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix |
| 39 |
http://miknix.homelinux.com |
Archives