Archives
Archives
| From: | Auke Booij <auke@××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations | ||
| Date: | Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:54:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | AANLkTimm1TIJaCiLc_DoCXzR8o4aNbN043oblPwNj9l8@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations by Markos Chandras |
||
| 1 | On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > Thoughts? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | If Gentoo doesn't seem to have time to maintain the stable tree, why |
| 5 | have it in the first place? What really is the advantage of having a |
| 6 | stable tree? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |