1 |
Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2012, 23:15:46 schrieb Markos Chandras: |
2 |
> On 05/05/2012 08:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, 5 May 2012 20:40:47 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> >> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with |
7 |
> >> the help of an eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to |
8 |
> >> get some of them into the portage tree. Now we have to decide |
9 |
> >> where to put them. |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> Suggestion: new category office-ext |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> >> What do you think? |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > office-plugins, to follow suit. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> This may be confusing as people would expect these plugins to work |
18 |
> with both {open,libre}office packages. If these plugins are just for |
19 |
> libreoffice then I would prefer app-libreoffice like other people have |
20 |
> already suggested |
21 |
|
22 |
I've collected information and the extensions (should) work with any office |
23 |
variant, openoffice and libreoffice. To be more precise, they should work with |
24 |
anything that uses the so-called "uno bridge". |
25 |
|
26 |
This is why I like the new category "office-plugins" best... and would like to |
27 |
implement that one. |
28 |
|
29 |
Any additional objections? |
30 |
|
31 |
Cheers, Andreas |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
36 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
37 |
kde (team lead), sci, tex, arm, printing |
38 |
dilfridge@g.o |
39 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |