| 1 |
On 17.2.2010 20.03, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> What is going on with all these undocumented changes? When I look at the |
| 5 |
> council logs to see what is in EAPI3, I don't see anything about removing |
| 6 |
> functions. This is just silly and wastes alot of people's time for no |
| 7 |
> practical gain. In my EAPI3 portage, bin/isolated-functions.sh still has |
| 8 |
> eqawarn() defined. So, what am I missing now? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The canonical documentation for eclasses is eclass-manpages generated |
| 12 |
man pages and those where changed in my original commit. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Also, other people think it is OK to change the behavior of functions and |
| 15 |
> not document it in devmanual? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
devmanual should either have a pointer to eclass-manpages or |
| 19 |
autogenerate from eclass-manpages. The relevant bug is here: |
| 20 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202656 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Petteri |
Archives