Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Philipp Riegger <lists@××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:36:15
Message-Id: 20110328013535.271d0e46@jesper.s.riegger.name
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits by Jeremy Olexa
1 On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:04:56 -0500
2 Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > > this is especially important for the people doing arch keywording
5 > > since they make a ton of commits. i'm looking at you armin76.
6 >
7 > One thing I don't get amidst this whole conversation is why I should
8 > sign a Manifest file when committing KEYWORDS or something equally as
9 > trivial like deleting ebuilds. By signing the Manifest, I interpret
10 > that as "yes, I committed this Manifest file and yes I trust every
11 > hash in this Manifest file" when in reality, I have no clue if the
12 > Manifest file is correct because I didn't inspect anything.
13 >
14 > Am I missing something?
15
16 You sign, that you did this. More or less. The guy before you did the
17 same. If there is an error all previous revisions of the tree are
18 available and you can check, whose mistake it was. Nothing really
19 changes, but I can check whether a gentoo dev committed the change and
20 who it was (and that it was not anybody who hacked some rsync mirror).
21
22 Philipp
23
24 --