Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:08:26
Message-Id: 20091220200412.GF840@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date by Mike Frysinger
1 On 20-12-2009 15:01:30 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Sunday 20 December 2009 09:49:09 Fabian Groffen wrote:
3 > > On 15-12-2009 09:54:36 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
4 > > > I will be following up discussions on various mailing lists to prepare
5 > > > the agenda. If you already want to suggest topics feel free to reply
6 > > > to this thread. You'll get a second chance with the meeting reminder
7 > > > approximately two weeks before the meeting. I will be sending a
8 > > > message about the two topics which did not make it last time and
9 > > > explain why. I should have sent that much earlier but well... you
10 > > > know...
11 > >
12 > > I'd like to council to discuss the current *$^&!! policy of
13 > > -dev-announce and -dev. I'd propose to at least implement the following
14 > > behaviour such that I:
15 > > - don't have to see some mails 3 (!) times and many 2 times
16 > > - don't get lost where the mail is/was
17 > > - get broken threading because the original mail was sent to another
18 > > list
19 >
20 > get a sane mail client that automatically handles messages with duplicate ids
21 > and references. cant say ive ever noticed a problem with kmail.
22
23 and gmane or even archives.g.o?
24
25
26 --
27 Fabian Groffen
28 Gentoo on a different level

Replies