Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
Michał Górny posted on Sun, 03 Jun 2012 09:22:04 +0200 as excerpted:
>> Even if only the files metatdata changes, that still adds a significant
>> cost to an rsync.
>
> I wonder when it will come to the point where git will be more efficient
> than rsync. Or maybe it would be already?
Handwavey guess, but I've figured git to be more efficient client-side
for some time. Server-side I don't know about, but I've presumed that's
the reason the switch-to-git plans haven't included switching the default
for user-syncs to git. I expect user/client side, git would be more
efficient already, but as I said, that's handwavey guesses.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
|
|
