1 |
nbensa@venkman ~ $ date ; echo ${Fredrik Jagenheim} |
2 |
Tuesday 29 April 2003 06:15 am |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 10:18:35PM +0200, Jon Lech Johansen wrote: |
5 |
> > [eula from microsoft] |
6 |
> |
7 |
> How would you interpret 'applicable OS Software'? |
8 |
|
9 |
Heh... I was asking the same question. |
10 |
|
11 |
> OTOH, it |
12 |
> can also be interpreted as you need a windows license to use, install |
13 |
> or reproduce the codecs. |
14 |
|
15 |
I think that's the spirit of the EULA. But I have a Windows 95 license, does |
16 |
it count? :-) |
17 |
|
18 |
Some where in the EULA posted by Jon, I read: "you need a Windows license and |
19 |
Windows running your system to be able to use this codecs." Maybe I'm wrong |
20 |
(IANAL) but read: |
21 |
|
22 |
> > If you have multiple validly licensed copies of the |
23 |
> > applicable OS Product, you may reproduce, install and use one copy of |
24 |
> > the OS Components as part of such OS Product on all of your computers |
25 |
> > running validly licensed copies of the applicable OS Product provided |
26 |
> > that you use such additional copies of the OS Components in accordance |
27 |
> > with the terms and conditions above. |
28 |
|
29 |
"... on all of your computers running validly licensed copies of the |
30 |
applicable OS..." |
31 |
|
32 |
Hmmmmm. |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
Regards, |
36 |
Norberto |