| 1 |
Hi! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 4 |
> Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>: |
| 5 |
> > What about ppc64? They are MONTHS behind on stabilization, |
| 6 |
> > even for security bugs (see bug 281821 for example). The Qt team |
| 7 |
> > feels this is no longer acceptable. We propose that any arch that |
| 8 |
> > can't keep up will be demoted to experimental status. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I surely subscribe to that. At the moment Brent (ranger) is |
| 11 |
> definitely alone on that arch. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
So am I on alpha.[0] It is doable, but it wears you thin - and |
| 14 |
it's extra bad because it means I have hardly any free time to |
| 15 |
mentor anybody. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That said, I hope whoever feels the need comes to me /before/ they |
| 18 |
file a bug for "Let's make alpha experimental". |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regards, |
| 21 |
Tobias |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
[0] Yes, armin76 helps, but he does so for many arches (and |
| 25 |
around of applause for that), but the majority of bugs for alpha |
| 26 |
are on my plate. |
Archives