On 07/14/2010 05:27 PM, Paul Arthur wrote:
> On 2010-07-14, William Hubbs<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500 William Hubbs
>>> <email@example.com> wrote: =20
>>>> All, =20 I have recently noticed that our amateur radio
>>>> applications are in the category media-radio. =20 Amateur Radio
>>>> is not considered part of the media, so I would like to propose
>>>> renaming this category to app-hamradio, or possibly moving the
>>>> amateur radio applications to app-hamradio if there are things in
>>>> media-radio which are not amateur radio related. =20
>>> I like the idea very much. But I am an radio amateur and therefore
>>> I am a little bit biased :). I was always confused to find them in
>>> media-radio. If we do the move please count on me.
>> I am an amateur radio operator as well, and that is why putting the
>> ham radio apps in"media-radio" bothers me. Ham radio is not part
>> of the media.
> But it is a medium. media-* has nothing to do with "the media"; I
> really don't see any point to this proposed change..
I say go for it. media-radio should be for V4L2 apps, mostly, that use
it. The remaining two can either go into media-tv or app-misc or some
other fitting category.