| 1 |
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:57:53 -0700 |
| 2 |
Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Btw, good catch on package.mask. Hhadn't thought of that, that |
| 5 |
> *will* be the most contentious point. That can be dealt w/ via |
| 6 |
> having git on portage-1 profile format so we'd have package.mask as |
| 7 |
> directories (which Ciaran will validly hate, and I won't like |
| 8 |
> due to having to write the portage-1 -> PMS translater for |
| 9 |
> rsync distribution), or coming up w/ a different way to split the |
| 10 |
> commits across multiple files, rather than a single. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That doesn't like a 'lesser evil' to me. I'd rather see those few |
| 13 |
conflicts and fix them once in a while rather than having to lookup |
| 14 |
multiple package.mask files with entries split in a semi-random manner. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Best regards, |
| 18 |
Michał Górny |
Archives