1 |
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 12:17:27PM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
2 |
> Am Donnerstag, 7. September 2006 11:11 schrieb Stuart Herbert: |
3 |
> > On 9/7/06, Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > > How wonderful this sort of "maintenance" is you can read here: |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146626 |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > Am I the only one who has a problem with this? |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > No. And I'm sure I'm not the only one who has a problem with your |
11 |
> > comment in that bug either. Bugzilla isn't there for flaming other |
12 |
> > devs. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > There was a time when we used to suspend devs for doing that. |
15 |
> Sadly we don't suspend developers for extended history of QA violations. |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
Not true, unfortunately these problems seem to very rarely get |
19 |
communicated to devrel... |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Jon Portnoy |
23 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |