1 |
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 04:40:33AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
2 |
> On 07/31/2011 03:59 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
3 |
> > On 30-07-2011 22:17, William Hubbs wrote: |
4 |
> >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:27:27AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
5 |
> >>> Since running separate /usr without mounting it from initramfs on |
6 |
> >>> top of / before init is and has been broken with udev for a long |
7 |
> >>> time now[1][2][3] |
8 |
> >>> |
9 |
> >>> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364235 [2] |
10 |
> >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove#Move_all_to_.2Fusr |
11 |
> >>> [3] |
12 |
> >>> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken |
13 |
> >>> |
14 |
> >>> |
15 |
> >>> |
16 |
> > Can we warn users about not doing the separate /usr mistake in the handbook? |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> >> There are actually two options for us according to upstream. One is |
19 |
> >> the one you are talking about -- mounting /usr from an initramfs |
20 |
> >> before / is mounted. The other is to mount local file systems, if |
21 |
> >> setups are simple enough, before we start udev. I could set this one |
22 |
> >> up easily enough just by moving localmount to the boot runlevel. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> >> Can we discuss both options? |
25 |
> > If there's any option that allows the use of a separate /usr partition |
26 |
> > without an initramfs, then let's explore it. I don't feel like having to |
27 |
> > use an initramfs just because I want a small / without /usr on it. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> The message is really missing all the context without explanation for |
30 |
> WHY you want it. |
31 |
|
32 |
Here is a good argument for supporting this. |
33 |
|
34 |
http://tldp.org/LDP/lame/LAME/linux-admin-made-easy/install-partitioning.html |
35 |
|
36 |
You can hose your system easier with one big file system with / and |
37 |
/usr combined than you can with multiple partitions. |
38 |
|
39 |
William |