1 |
Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:34 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit : |
2 |
> El lun, 14-02-2011 a las 11:24 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue escribió: |
3 |
> > Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 11:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos a écrit : |
4 |
> > > El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 18:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
5 |
> > > > Hello |
6 |
> > > > |
7 |
> > > > Please see attached news item for reviewing as part of the fix for |
8 |
> > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346491 |
9 |
> > > > |
10 |
> > > > Thanks |
11 |
> > > > |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > > This is an updated news item for trying to cover Ciaran and Matthew |
14 |
> > > suggestions: |
15 |
> > > 1. It doesn't ask people to use USE="*" |
16 |
> > > 2. Before sending this, I would add all cameras to base/make.defaults as |
17 |
> > > already done for similar cases (like alsa, lcd devices and others) |
18 |
> > > |
19 |
> > > Do you agree with this? |
20 |
> > > |
21 |
> > > Thanks :-) |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > no, adding all cameras is most likely a waste of time for maintainers, |
24 |
> > it is prone to errors when cameras get added/removed which is already |
25 |
> > complicated enough to maintain. |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> |
28 |
> What kind of errors will people see? As I have just tested, if I run: |
29 |
> CAMERAS="bbhsgdd" emerge -pv media-libs/libgphoto2 |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I get no error (that would be equivalent to a camera that got removed on |
32 |
> a bump). |
33 |
|
34 |
I was talking about human error while adding stuff to appropriate files. |
35 |
It happens already often enough with just the IUSE_EXPAND feature. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
39 |
Gentoo |