Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:21:00 +0100
On Samstag, 28. Februar 2009, Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Втр, 24/02/2009 в 16:14 +0200, Serkan Kaba пишет:
> > lucene-contrib eclass in java-experimental [1] sets EAPI to 1 to use
> > slot deps. And I think that's a valid usage.
> >
> > 1:
> > http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/browser/java-experimental/eclass/luc
> >ene-contrib.eclass
>
> It's better (the only way...) to die in case an ebuild sets lower EAPI,
> like kde4-functions.eclass does:
>
> case ${EAPI} in
>     2) : ;;
>     *) die "No way! EAPI older than 2 is not supported." ;;
> esac

I still dislike die in global scope, why not do it like autotools.eclass?
It does:
DEPEND="INCORRECT-WANT_AUTOCONF-SETTING-IN-EBUILD"

Regards
Matthias


References:
Re: Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)
-- Serkan Kaba
Re: Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)
-- Peter Volkov
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)
Next by thread:
Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)
Previous by date:
Re: Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)
Next by date:
Re: Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.