1 |
On 05/24/2012 01:52 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: |
2 |
> On 25 May 2012 08:28, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> I expect that reading and validating the cache is probably not going to |
5 |
>> be much faster than just parsing the eclasses over again. |
6 |
>> -- |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Unless, you don't care if the cache is out-dated because the cache is |
9 |
> optional / the syntax checking is optional, and its only made |
10 |
> available when you generate it manually. |
11 |
|
12 |
Putting the responsibility of cache validation on the user is not really |
13 |
an option here, because it's just going to lead to bug reports of the |
14 |
form "repoman is using stale eclass info in its checks". |
15 |
-- |
16 |
Thanks, |
17 |
Zac |