Archives
Archives
| From: | heroxbd@g.o | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual/pkgconfig to support lighter alternatives | ||
| Date: | Wed, 02 May 2012 12:11:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | 86obq6g4xn.fsf@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] new virtual/pkgconfig to support lighter alternatives by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | Hi Mike, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> writes: |
| 4 | > the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs |
| 5 | > pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > any comments ? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I would vote for it! |
| 10 | |
| 11 | I feel ill to bootstrap glib and pkg-config. It feels worse to call for |
| 12 | a equal foot as gcc/binutils/glibc. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.gtk%2B.devel.general/21523 |
| 15 | |
| 16 | pkg-config's functionality is too simple to be involved with this chaos. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Looking forward to it. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | Yours, |
| 21 | Benda |