On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:54:38 +0000
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...> wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:51:11 +0100
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote:
> > > 2. (with myeclass.eclass containing EAPI=2)
> > > -----
> > > EAPI=1
> > > inherit myeclass
> > 
> > Invalid
> 
> QA violation, but legal and a pain in the ass.

I didn't think it was a brainy thing to do, but I can't find anything
saying it isn't allowed.  It probably shouldn't be.

> > > 3. (with myeclass.eclass containing EAPI=2)
> > > -----
> > > EAPI=5
> > > inherit myeclass
> > 
> > Invalid
> 
> QA violation, but legal and a pain in the ass.
> 

Can we ban eclasses from setting EAPI?  Is there any case where it
would be sane?


-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662