| 1 |
On 05/05/12 14:40, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Hiya, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> there's a growing culture of libreoffice extensions, and (with the help of an |
| 6 |
> eclass prepared by scarabeus) it would be nice to get some of them into the |
| 7 |
> portage tree. Now we have to decide where to put them. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Suggestion: new category office-ext |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> What do you think? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
No preference myself, but we already have e.g. app-emacs and www-apache |
| 14 |
which (I guess?) reflect the fact that emacs lies under app-foo and |
| 15 |
apache under www-bar. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That would suggest app-libreoffice? |
Archives