| 1 |
On 22 June 2011 21:38, Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Whatever happened to implementing tags for the Portage tree? The idea |
| 4 |
> behind tags was to avoid spamming users with more and more |
| 5 |
> directories, especially for apps that are hard to categorize. Which, |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Agreed. From the perspective of what will need to happen with regard |
| 8 |
to package moves, implementing this change is likely to be incredibly |
| 9 |
disruptive to users, and possibly cause a few wtfs/cry fests. ( Worst |
| 10 |
case scenario pessimism I admit ). |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'd love a tag solution, that'd be nice, is there a GLEP for it yet? |
| 13 |
And if so, how long will it take to get this "tag" feature supported |
| 14 |
by EAPI standards? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Kent |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, |
| 20 |
3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz |
Archives