1 |
Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote: |
2 |
> Simon Stelling wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Edgar Hucek wrote: |
5 |
>>> I know my tools but not necessarly the normal user who wanna use gentoo |
6 |
>>> and is ending frustrated. |
7 |
>> If the users are too lazy to read the documentation, why should we care |
8 |
>> about them? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Because we risk that Gentoo may receive the "user-UN-friendly" label and |
11 |
> become irrelevant in the long run? I know it ain't gonna happen, but still. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Both Edgar and you have some valid points. He refers mostly to the out-of-box |
14 |
> experience, which includes compiling GNOME and its dependencies at the install |
15 |
> time. With USE="accessibility" enabled, which makes perfect sense for people |
16 |
> with disabilities. And then the first-ever Gentoo installation breaks on the |
17 |
> speech-tools and festival. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> How would *you* feel in such case? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> You OTOH bring to the table a fact that developers shouldn't be that much |
22 |
> concerned with the stabilization/testing of packages before new release of |
23 |
> installation media. But new releases *ARE* targeted specifically at new users |
24 |
> and it's them who suffer the most. Next to it is the reputation of Gentoo and |
25 |
> its developers. Edgar's call was targeted mostly at releng and QA teams, who |
26 |
> should poke developers to decrease number of similar problems. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I maintain a bunch of Debian/sparc, Debian/i386, Gentoo/amd64, Gentoo/x86, |
29 |
> Solaris/sparc, Ubuntu/i686 boxes and mind you, out-of-box experience at |
30 |
> install time means A LOT. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> More respect to the users => more respect to Gentoo. |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
Let's see... |
36 |
|
37 |
Several points (misunderstandings) need to be clarified. |
38 |
|
39 |
1) Gentoo is not intended to be an out-of-the-box distro, but instead, a |
40 |
customizable distro. Can see the difference?.. There are many, one of |
41 |
them is that users should 'make' the process of using Gentoo _friendly_ |
42 |
partially by themselves through reading documentation and tutorial when |
43 |
needed (and sometimes going through a list of bugs to know what it is |
44 |
going on). |
45 |
|
46 |
2) Gentoo releases are "very".touppercase different to most of the other |
47 |
distros. Gentoo releases are mainly intended to be used as a tool to get |
48 |
you started building your _own_ system in an automatic way through |
49 |
scripts/metadata, this being very different to other distros, where they |
50 |
simply force you to use version 6.6.6 as a bunch of dead packages that |
51 |
won't likely suffer any major changes within the next 6 months until |
52 |
upgrading (which can be a very painful process) to the next 6.6.7 release. |
53 |
|
54 |
This is precisely why i say Gentoo is an incremental meta-distro. |
55 |
|
56 |
3) Considering the two points above, i therefore think , there is no |
57 |
point (and actually makes no sense) to bitch at our releng team (which |
58 |
did a great job) because two packages don't currently compile. |
59 |
|
60 |
4) Gentoo is more a community than anything else. So we indeed all |
61 |
deserve respect. Some developers put into this project (the releng team |
62 |
being one of them) a lot of effort, so making comments like this thread |
63 |
might be very insulting for many people; apart of making false claims |
64 |
that could lead to a bunch of misconceptions. Now who is being |
65 |
disrespectful? |
66 |
|
67 |
If neither of those points are convincing enough, then remember free |
68 |
software comes with *NO-WARRANTY* |
69 |
|
70 |
Thanks, |
71 |
|
72 |
My 0.2bs |
73 |
|
74 |
|
75 |
|
76 |
-- |
77 |
|
78 |
|
79 |
Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org" |
80 |
Gentoo Linux |
81 |
|
82 |
|
83 |
-- |
84 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |