Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Bill Anderson <bill@...>
Subject: Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:40:42 -0700
drobbins@g.o wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 11:06:54AM +0100, Achim Gottinger wrote:
> 
> 
>> autofs-4.0.0_pre9.ebuild should work. Maybe Daniel can document the naming
>> pattern somewhere on the net.
> 
> 
> There's some (old but mostly correct) documentation at the beginning of
> /usr/lib/python/portage.py that covers how the version numbers work.


Oooh, so Portage has python libraries to work with it, or is it done 
using python?



Replies:
Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers
-- drobbins
References:
ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers
-- Justin Vander Ziel
Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers
-- Achim Gottinger
Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers
-- drobbins
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers
Next by thread:
Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers
Previous by date:
no more long subject lines! :)
Next by date:
Re: ebuild, ip6tables headaches, kernel confusion, xinetd vs. tcpwrappers


Updated Oct 31, 2011

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.