Gentoo Linux -- List Archive: gentoo-dev

Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647

List Archive: gentoo-dev

Navigation:

Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >

Headers:

To:	gentoo-dev@g.o
From:	Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o>
Subject:	Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date:	Thu, 24 May 2012 01:07:08 +0530

I, for one, think we should stay with CVS and leave all this git
Linusware to the new-fangled Fedora kids with their fancy init systems
and tight coupling. CVS was good enough for my grandfather, and it's
good enough for you.
-- 
Arun Raghavan
http://arunraghavan.net/
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)

Replies:

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Matt Turner

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Alexey Shvetsov

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Ezequiel Garcia

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- hasufell

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Fabio Erculiani

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Nirbheek Chauhan

References:

Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Alexey Shvetsov

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson

Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Alexey Shvetsov