| 1 |
On Thursday 13 October 2011 14:55:45 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thursday 13 October 2011 12:30:06 Arun Raghavan wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> While I've seen a lot of whining about this whole issue, I certainly |
| 5 |
> >> haven't been seen any effort to actually solve the problem within the |
| 6 |
> >> existing framework. For example, if someone cares enough, why not |
| 7 |
> >> write a wrapper script to track down the programs and libraries at |
| 8 |
> >> runtime that actually do use /usr so it's easier to say "these |
| 9 |
> >> packages install rules that need / and /usr on the same partition". |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > (1) udev has provided a workaround of sorts for this already: udevadm |
| 12 |
> > trigger --type=failed. this is the udev-postmount init.d script. (2) |
| 13 |
> > it's fairly trivial to locate most (all?) the failing rules with a |
| 14 |
> > single grep: grep /usr -R /lib/udev/rules.d/. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> If this comment is true (haven't looked at the code): |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375263#c23 |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> that trigger has been removed from udev. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
... which is what spurred this entire debate in the first place |
| 23 |
-mike |
Archives