Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Subject: Re: The Python problem
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:52:26 -0400
On Monday, June 27, 2011 12:00:19 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 17:53, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
> > I like the ruby approach for the reason that it doesn't require users to
> > run update scripts like python-updater.
> 
> Sure, but if that means the developers now have to bump every package
> in the tree when a new version of Python comes out, I'm not sure
> that's the best trade-off.

if that's the requirement, i'd lean towards the python route we have today.  
especially because python-updater will hit all necessary packages where-as 
ruby will often not as that requires you to do `emerge -u <all installed 
packages>`.
-mike
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
Replies:
Re: The Python problem
-- Hans de Graaff
References:
The Python problem
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: The Python problem
-- Petteri Räty
Re: The Python problem
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
REMOVE
Next by thread:
Re: The Python problem
Previous by date:
Re: The Python problem
Next by date:
Re: The Python problem


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.