1 |
maillog: 06/04/2004-20:54:30(+0000): Jason Huebel types |
2 |
> Andrew Ross wrote: |
3 |
> | Does anyone know why net-irc/xchat uses the local USE flag xchatnogtk |
4 |
> | instead of looking at the global flag gtk? |
5 |
> | |
6 |
> |>From use.local.desc: |
7 |
> | net-irc/xchat:xchatnogtk - Disables building the GTK front end to XChat |
8 |
> | |
9 |
> |>From use.desc: |
10 |
> | gtk - Adds support for x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit) |
11 |
> | |
12 |
> | Seems like xchatnogtk is simply duplicating the intended effect of -gtk |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Well, if you tie xchat to the global gtk USE flag, someone who installs |
15 |
> xchat may wonder why it isn't working for them when they don't have gtk |
16 |
> in their USE flags. Has anyone actually taken a look at xchat-text... UGH. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I for one don't have gtk in my USE flags (I prefer KDE/Qt), but I use |
19 |
> the gtk interface for XChat. The default interface that most people |
20 |
> expect when installing xchat is the GTK interface, not text. Maybe a |
21 |
> better choice would be to have an "xchattextonly" USE flag or something |
22 |
> similar. |
23 |
|
24 |
That's what per-package USE flags are for. It doesn't make any sense to create |
25 |
extra local use flags, when the functionality is already there. Other examples include: |
26 |
|
27 |
net-analyzer/mtr |
28 |
sys-devel/distcc |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
/ Georgi Georgiev / Here I am, fifty-eight, and I still don't / |
32 |
\ chutz@×××.net \ know what I want to be when I grow up. -- \ |
33 |
/ +81(90)6266-1163 / Peter Drucker / |