| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 10/11/11 04:00, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:33:15 +0300 Samuli Suominen |
| 6 |
> <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> It's not like fastened lastriting hasn't happened before. I |
| 9 |
>> question your motives in picking this particular one. It's not |
| 10 |
>> like I expected cookies for the time I've put into this porting |
| 11 |
>> effort, but not this "attack" either. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Then stop trying to remove packages that have an active maintainer. |
| 14 |
> I could have sworn that was written down somewhere. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
Isn't this the same situation with gcc stabilizations? Once the |
| 18 |
timeframe for fixing broken packages with e.g gcc-4.5 is passed, the |
| 19 |
remaining broken packages will be gone. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
- -- |
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOk+uhAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCPaIP/0WOzleagPvw82n7yPN3RO5U |
| 28 |
DSOYXsSr64gpbRFI1w+3/lBE50fNvWAA7taRU2+c6ccHA1AcC99iPJ+FIymxZFck |
| 29 |
2C4hRHRNhigxwZw+n+SBzXG2hNL+fvzWrRWdWOPz9WLjWr3DQF9XENIQz9rwBEij |
| 30 |
f2QdTbIK99BEgHl5ibYFI6yhHDbtYBaBLNI9TbBQsGvNhjT0UM1+FHNFRvCPxERY |
| 31 |
m/U/Ps+2sETa5Hf+FQou5rFUptJvY45BVriggDK9mQ1R7gHo9H5m7RkGPrZAKprC |
| 32 |
kZ0pRZkYrWGkdVk4FZXQPJcx6DAQ/WvrJH3JGmSL6nC3lVLK+htLbsSC+NSjFqsN |
| 33 |
02k7XSkdRVQPWkv6bPqdQMcDg55pc+pKaW4nzi69T+1aoMomgxEwHrTOfeXyOeN5 |
| 34 |
Wu7Abgg+W75aZLXzW+dzn3etCCW/3ha8GoQwqzTIGmd7hedWhmaiKfmCUZbM/Ac5 |
| 35 |
4tWnHSvA0BK4vI3NGrV8BZLO8FKrGDnSu6tHGosgcQ5HMlm4YFOmMOGmfO271Ecg |
| 36 |
bA9YjpQZCX2BiJ6FwaDuY1NLNxcT1djvsVNg+t+7ZbLyQ1r4s7OXiTPHmfDURK0h |
| 37 |
af08Ap1OzeBP434zSjBxU1JU40zk3eeb4/QWaAk9S+gGU05hC6jnIEpA0vY6q0ep |
| 38 |
Tl/SvNyjpN3MUh0FG8SZ |
| 39 |
=o4f/ |
| 40 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives