1 |
On 7/13/10 12:32 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:25:51 +0000 (UTC), "Kacper Kowalik (xarthisius)" |
3 |
> <xarthisius@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> if use doc; then |
6 |
>> insinto /usr/share/doc/${PF} |
7 |
>> doins doc/*.pdf || die |
8 |
> |
9 |
> An open question to all: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Should we be hiding pdf's behind USE=doc?? I've seen it here and there |
12 |
> as of late. I thought USE=doc was for compiling docs and/or pulling in |
13 |
> extra deps to build docs. |
14 |
|
15 |
In my opinion we're never going to have 100% consistency here. I'd say |
16 |
let everybody implement it in a way one thinks is the best. |
17 |
|
18 |
The description of the flag is "Adds extra documentation (API, Javadoc, |
19 |
etc)". So if something is an extra documentation, it seems to be fine to |
20 |
"hide" it behind USE=doc. |
21 |
|
22 |
And I'd prefer to keep the meaning of "extra documentation" flexible and |
23 |
open to interpretation, just because there is no obvious benefit to aim |
24 |
for 100% consistency here, and overstandardization would be bad. |
25 |
|
26 |
Paweł |