Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: John Brooks <aspecialj@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage.
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:41:48
Message-Id: e646fda30808161041y20160097h59de072903cdb752@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage. by Robert Bridge
1 It can be somewhat difficult to find someone to look over and commit an
2 ebuild on an unmaintained package though - the several times i've done that
3 have involved tracking down developers with previous commits to the package
4 or who are active in the category and trying to find one who isn't retired
5 (I have good taste in packages, apparently - high turnover :P). On one, I
6 had to talk to 7 different developers before I found someone willing and
7 able to help. Just adding to the bug probably won't help unless it's
8 assigned to someone - take a look at it's changelog
9 (/usr/portage/category/package/Changelog) and try to get in touch with
10 specific people if nobody responds to the tracker.
11
12 Random idea: How about a different bug assignee for maintainer-needed
13 packages with provided ebuilds/patches? Either something generic, or try to
14 go for something more category/package specific (herds, etc). Lots of work
15 for bugwranglers, though. There is a huge difference to developers between
16 an unmaintained package with no progress and just looking over an ebuild
17 that has been used successfully by several people.
18
19 - John Brooks
20
21 On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Robert Bridge <robert@××××××××.com> wrote:
22
23 > On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:42:35 +0200
24 > Aniruddha <mailing_list@××××××.nl> wrote:
25 >
26 > > I've filed the bugreport (version bump) a year ago. It looks like borg
27 > > has no maintainer.
28 >
29 > So maintain it. You don't need to be a dev to write an ebuild, and
30 > there are enough devs who are happy to throw an eye over user donated
31 > ebuilds and commit them to the tree...
32 >
33 > Removing a package from portage simply because no one has commited the
34 > up-to-date version you want is silly. If the only problem is
35 > no version bumping, provide the ebuild. Someone will commit it. I've
36 > done that for a few packages, it's not hard.
37 >
38 > I don't know anything about borg specifically, but as a user, I would
39 > not want to see packages being removed from portage just because the
40 > devs are too busy to write version bump ebuilds.
41 >
42 > Rob.
43 >
44 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: remove app-office/borg from portage. Tobias Scherbaum <dertobi123@g.o>