[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3

[Torsten Veller]

* Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>:
> On Sunday 17 January 2010 16:12:29 David Leverton wrote:
> > On Sunday 17 January 2010 20:38:48 Petteri Räty wrote:
> > > With GLEP 42 and proper logging of e* messages I think we shouldn't
> > > annoy users any more with ebeep or epause so attached is a patch only
> > > defines these functions for EAPIs 0, 1 and 2. Anyone have a reason to
> > > keep these around for EAPI 3? If not I will apply the attached patch.

The patch only defines these functions for EAPI=0 and EAPI=1.

> > The eclass-manpages comments should be updated too.
>
> you mean you should re-emerge it on your system

I think he means that the patch should modify @DESCRIPTION too.